Ir ao conteúdo
Regras do Clube do Hardware

Pontuação/Rendimento de CPUs e GPUs no folding@home

V i X

Por V i X
em Programas

 Compartilhar

Posts recomendados

  • Membro VIP
V i X
 

V i X

Postado
  • Autor
  • Membro VIP
Postado

Pontuação/Rendimento das HD68xx:

Folding with a Radeon HD6800? Possible, but underwhelming!

It seems we were wrong when we announced in our recent news that the Radeon HD6000 would need a new client and core in order to fold.

Though we were wrong about the current client being incapable of folding with the cards, we were right that the performance would not be of the first order.

This has been confirmed by two users on the official forum, Tobit and mdk777. The current client (6.23) is perfectly capable of folding with AMD's new cards if one simply starts it up with the -forcegpu ati_r700 flag, just as one would with a Radeon HD5000.

Unfortunately, the performance figures are disappointing; the current core is unable to efficiently take advantage of these chips' additional calculation units.

mdk777 got 3,153 PPD (p5733) on his non-overclocked HD6850. With the fan speed manually set at 70%, he was able to keep the GPU at 50°C. The difference in power consumption between the card idling and folding was 115W.

For his part, Tobit experimented on a HD6870. He received 3,618 PPD, but unfortunately didn't provide any information on the operating temperature or power consumption of the card.

By way of comparison, we invite you to read (or re-read) Radeon HD5770 test.

Meanwhile, we'll just have to wait for the Radeon HD6900's release at the end of November, and the new OpenCL core, and hope to see some performance increase from the red side of the force.

Source: Official Forum

http://en.fah-addict.net/news/news.php

Luiz Rhené
 

Luiz Rhené

Postado
Postado

Q9550 @ 3.8GHz, Dominator @1074MHz Win 7 x64

TPF: 4 mim e 09 seg

PPD: 11.000

Project: 6077 (Run 0, Clone 41, Gen 193)

[15:12:32]

[15:12:32] Assembly optimizations on if available.

[15:12:32] Entering M.D.

[15:12:38] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0%)

[15:16:47] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1%)

[15:20:57] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2%)

[15:25:06] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3%)

[15:29:15] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps (4%)

[15:33:24] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps (5%)

[15:37:33] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps (6%)

[15:41:42] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps (7%)

[15:45:51] Completed 40000 out of 500000 steps (8%)

[15:50:00] Completed 45000 out of 500000 steps (9%)

[15:54:09] Completed 50000 out of 500000 steps (10%)

[15:58:19] Completed 55000 out of 500000 steps (11%)

Ta bom assim.:D

Sambaquy
 

Sambaquy

Postado
Postado
Q9550 @ 3.8GHz, Dominator @1074MHz Win 7 x64

TPF: 4 mim e 09 seg

PPD: 11.000

Project: 6077 (Run 0, Clone 41, Gen 193)

[15:12:32]

[15:12:32] Assembly optimizations on if available.

[15:12:32] Entering M.D.

[15:12:38] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0%)

[15:16:47] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1%)

[15:20:57] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2%)

[15:25:06] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3%)

[15:29:15] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps (4%)

[15:33:24] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps (5%)

[15:37:33] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps (6%)

[15:41:42] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps (7%)

[15:45:51] Completed 40000 out of 500000 steps (8%)

[15:50:00] Completed 45000 out of 500000 steps (9%)

[15:54:09] Completed 50000 out of 500000 steps (10%)

[15:58:19] Completed 55000 out of 500000 steps (11%)

Ta bom assim.:D

Muito bom, cadê o meu cooler pra eu chegar perto disso ou passar, rsss espero que chegue semana que vem.

  • Membro VIP
V i X
 

V i X

Postado
  • Autor
  • Membro VIP
Postado
Q9550 @ 3.8GHz, Dominator @1074MHz Win 7 x64

TPF: 4 mim e 09 seg

PPD: 11.000

Project: 6077 (Run 0, Clone 41, Gen 193)

[15:12:32]

[15:12:32] Assembly optimizations on if available.

[15:12:32] Entering M.D.

[15:12:38] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0%)

[15:16:47] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1%)

[15:20:57] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2%)

[15:25:06] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3%)

[15:29:15] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps (4%)

[15:33:24] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps (5%)

[15:37:33] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps (6%)

[15:41:42] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps (7%)

[15:45:51] Completed 40000 out of 500000 steps (8%)

[15:50:00] Completed 45000 out of 500000 steps (9%)

[15:54:09] Completed 50000 out of 500000 steps (10%)

[15:58:19] Completed 55000 out of 500000 steps (11%)

Ta bom assim.:D

Adicionado. Parabéns pelo result... :joia:

fernando1
 

fernando1

Postado
Postado

GTS 450 indo para a quinta WU:

WU 10942

GTS450 1GB@882/1764/3800 -> TPF: 1mim:00seg, PPD: 13.320

As frequênicas estão conforme o modelo da VGA GTS 450 EVGA SSC

  • Membro VIP
V i X
 

V i X

Postado
  • Autor
  • Membro VIP
Postado
GTS 450 indo para a quinta WU:

WU 10942

GTS450 1GB@882/1764/3800 -> TPF: 1mim:00seg, PPD: 13.320

As frequênicas estão conforme o modelo da VGA GTS 450 EVGA SSC

Adicionado. A 450 está dando um show mesmo, excelente resultado...

Thanks! :joia:

  • Membro VIP
V i X
 

V i X

Postado
  • Autor
  • Membro VIP
Postado
Vix, que tal separar as BigWU's das SMP??

Pensei nisso também, mas acho que vou colocar entre parênteses, informando que é uma bigWU, e mais uma observação no final da tabela explicando o que são bigWUs e porque a alta pontuação que os processadores conseguem com elas. Separar do SMP acho que não seria uma boa, até porque assim ficaria menos organizado.

  • Membro VIP
V i X
 

V i X

Postado
  • Autor
  • Membro VIP
Postado
Sei lá.. pensei que, como CPU e SMP2 são dois tipos, requisitos e pontuação diferentes, as Big's também são....

Bom, mas elas ainda são projetos do SMP, as bigs não tem um cliente só para elas, por isso que não dá para separá-las... Mas que elas diferem bem das outras WUs do SMP, isso é verdade.

maxvo
 

maxvo

Postado
Postado

2x Intel Xeon Quadcore E5530 2.40ghz, Samsung 128GB (16x8)DDR3 800, Win Server 2008 Enterprise

Client: SMP

TPF =~ 2min 31seg

PPD = 23368

[09:23:28] Project: 6077 (Run 0, Clone 99, Gen 92)

[09:23:28]

[09:23:28] Assembly optimizations on if available.

[09:23:28] Entering M.D.

[09:23:34] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0%)

[09:26:04] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1%)

[09:28:35] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2%)

[09:31:06] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3%)

[09:33:37] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps (4%)

[09:36:07] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps (5%)

[09:38:38] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps (6%)

[09:41:08] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps (7%)

[09:43:39] Completed 40000 out of 500000 steps (8%)

[09:46:10] Completed 45000 out of 500000 steps (9%)

[09:48:41] Completed 50000 out of 500000 steps (10%)

[09:51:12] Completed 55000 out of 500000 steps (11%)

[09:53:41] Completed 60000 out of 500000 steps (12%)

[09:56:12] Completed 65000 out of 500000 steps (13%)

[09:58:43] Completed 70000 out of 500000 steps (14%)

[10:01:14] Completed 75000 out of 500000 steps (15%)

[10:03:45] Completed 80000 out of 500000 steps (16%)

[10:06:16] Completed 85000 out of 500000 steps (17%)

[10:08:49] Completed 90000 out of 500000 steps (18%)

[10:11:21] Completed 95000 out of 500000 steps (19%)

[10:13:55] Completed 100000 out of 500000 steps (20%)

[10:16:27] Completed 105000 out of 500000 steps (21%)

[10:19:01] Completed 110000 out of 500000 steps (22%)

[10:21:33] Completed 115000 out of 500000 steps (23%)

[10:24:06] Completed 120000 out of 500000 steps (24%)

[10:26:38] Completed 125000 out of 500000 steps (25%)

[10:29:09] Completed 130000 out of 500000 steps (26%)

[10:31:41] Completed 135000 out of 500000 steps (27%)

[10:34:14] Completed 140000 out of 500000 steps (28%)

[10:36:45] Completed 145000 out of 500000 steps (29%)

[10:39:17] Completed 150000 out of 500000 steps (30%)

[10:41:52] Completed 155000 out of 500000 steps (31%)

[10:44:24] Completed 160000 out of 500000 steps (32%)

[10:46:55] Completed 165000 out of 500000 steps (33%)

[10:49:25] Completed 170000 out of 500000 steps (34%)

[10:51:56] Completed 175000 out of 500000 steps (35%)

[10:54:28] Completed 180000 out of 500000 steps (36%)

[10:56:59] Completed 185000 out of 500000 steps (37%)

[10:59:30] Completed 190000 out of 500000 steps (38%)

[11:02:02] Completed 195000 out of 500000 steps (39%)

[11:04:35] Completed 200000 out of 500000 steps (40%)

  • Membro VIP
V i X
 

V i X

Postado
  • Autor
  • Membro VIP
Postado

Putz, agora que fui ver, as GTX460 do Panão e do Marcus são as de 1GB, mas eu não sei se as do Fernando são as de 768MB ou as de 1GB... Tem como confirmar Fernando?

  • Membro VIP
V i X
 

V i X

Postado
  • Autor
  • Membro VIP
Postado
Ola Vix.

As minhas são 768Mb.

Valeu, já corrigi na tabela...

I7 920 D0 4.0GHZ + 1x2gb 1600mhz + Gtx 275 rodando Cliente GPU

P 2684

Frame : 00:50:56 - 16.942,7 PPD

Adicionado. :joia:

jaobutzke
 

jaobutzke

Postado
Postado
Jao, sei que não é o tópico, mas o que você fez para baixar esse tpf? Ensina a receita do bolo.

Pra falar a verdade, não sei. quando cheguei em casa ao meio-dia tava já com a 2684 nesse tpf.

Visitante
Este tópico está impedido de receber novas respostas.
 Compartilhar
Ir à lista de tópicos

Sobre o Clube do Hardware

No ar desde 1996, o Clube do Hardware é uma das maiores, mais antigas e mais respeitadas comunidades sobre tecnologia do Brasil. Leia mais

Direitos autorais

Não permitimos a cópia ou reprodução do conteúdo do nosso site, fórum, newsletters e redes sociais, mesmo citando-se a fonte. Leia mais

Mais

×
×
  • Criar novo...